Oil sands make the most sustainable corporations list
Canadian-based Corporate Knights announced its sixth annual Global 100 list of the most sustainable large corporations in the world. This includes oil sands players, Suncor, Nexen and Shell, and provides also other surprises.
In the energy sector (see table below), the selection of oil sands producers amongst the seemed surprising. But perhaps this demonstrates the assertive leadership of oil sands producers in the sustainability debate and embracing of related tools. They managed to become recognized amongst the most sustainable companies (at least based of Corporate Knights’ methodology) without exiting one of the more controversial segments of the oil & gas sector.
| Company | Country | Rank |
| Origin Energy Limited | AUSTRALIA | 56 |
| Omv Ag | AUSTRIA | 76 |
| Petroleo Brasileiro Sa | BRAZIL | 96 |
| Suncor Energy | CANADA | 40 |
| Encana Corp. | CANADA | 25 |
| Nexen Inc | CANADA | 59 |
| Enbridge Inc | CANADA | 16 |
| Transcanada Corp. | CANADA | 65 |
| Neste Oil Oyj | FINLAND | 85 |
| Statoilhydro Asa | NORWAY | 67 |
| Bg Group Plc | UNITED KINGDOM | 29 |
| Royal Dutch Shell Plc | UNITED KINGDOM | 20 |
Looking at the nine Canadian companies which made the list (see table below), it was probably not surprising to note the dominance of the extractive and financial sectors. Five extractive related companies made it to the list, but this did not include any of the prominent Canadian mining companies. The financial sector was also well represented and includes the Royal Bank of Canada. During the same week, RBC also managed a third place ranking in the ‘Public Eye Award', which takes Davos as a platform with its “shame-on-you-awards” given to the “nastiest corporate players of the year.” RBC’s was nominated for its prominent financing role of the Canadian oil sands sector.
| Canadian Company | Sector | Ranking |
| Enbridge Inc | Energy | 16 |
| Encana Corp. | Energy | 25 |
| Suncor Energy | Energy | 40 |
| Sun Life Financial Inc | Insurance | 50 |
| Nexen Inc | Energy | 59 |
| Transcanada Corp. | Energy | 65 |
| Toronto-Dominion Bank | Banks | 68 |
| Royal Bank Of Canada | Banks | 71 |
| Telus Corp. | Telecom | 88 |
Others have voiced some opinions about the methodology and weighting used by Corporate Knights which seem to create some interesting results. Bloggers like Eleine Cohen noted in her piece that there was no overlap between the top 10 ranked companies and those companies which had the highest scores in terms of transparency. Elaine also lamented that only seven of the Global 100 Most Sustainable Corporations had over 25% women directors - and two had actually none.
Perhaps one more point: a really interesting 'piece of the puzzle' lies in the ‘empty space.’ How and what are the other 2900 companies doing which were part of the original universe of companies but did not make it to the top 100 list - perhaps they deserve some public eye awards? What are your thoughts about Corporate Knights' "definitive" global 100 most sustainable corporations?
This entry was posted on Sunday, January 31st, 2010 at 11:29 am and is filed under Equator Principles, Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) sustainability reporting, Mining. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
February 4th, 2010 at 7:19 am
Dear Mehrdad,
Very good point . Another interesting information : investments in Latin America …
Best wishes from Brazil
Silvio Barone
Director of Strategyc Partnerships
BARCA – Brazilian Actions / Resilience, Climate Adaptation
June 8th, 2010 at 5:20 am
Just came across this interesting blog entry by Warren Levyon CSRwire which seemed very relevant to this blog: The difference between CSR and sustainability? Grandchildren.
BP and Goldman Sachs illustrate a crucial difference between corporate social responsibility and sustainability. Sustainability must be an impact yardstick, a lagging measure of the cumulative, aggregate and long-term effect of everything we do. CSR is an activity yardstick, a leading indicator of contributions that, though positive, can co-exist with unsustainable behavior that eventually will overwhelm any good that’s done.
See full CSRwire blog here:
January 5th, 2011 at 4:29 pm
This blog entry made it to my Top 10 for 2010. Full list posted here