PRIZMA

Bankable. Credible. Sustainable.

Flower

A Little Secret – Sustainability Leadership at the Business Roundtable

The Business Roundtable is an association of CEOs of leading US companies with $6 trillion in annual revenues and nearly 12 million employees. So when they published a report entitled Enhancing Our Commitment to a Sustainable Future, I had to take a look and found an unsung hero.

The report contains statements by nearly 100 CEOs on their businesses’ commitments to lower emissions, increased energy efficiency and pursue more sustainable business practices. A little research also showed that over half of the featured companies in this report use GRI’s sustainability reporting framework (see attached spreadsheet: BRT GRI Use Review - and listing at end of this blog).  I suspect other featured companies also utilize the GRI framework but prefer not to advertise that fact publically (perhaps a good topic for a future blog after I finish some billable work).

So why is this significant and how does this relate to activities of other CEO-led associations? According to SocialFunds.com, only about 13% of companies listed on the S&P 500 publish GRI-type sustainability reports. But as evidenced in the Business Roundtable’s publication, this small group gets the lion share of visibility.

What about the other members of the Business Roundtable or the S&P500? Just like their GRI-reporting peers, they all continuously invest millions of dollars in policies, systems, processes, monitoring, auditing and reporting.  Think about quality, environmental and occupational safety systems. Many also have stakeholder engagement processes in place (perhaps without using the term 'stakeholders'). These include customer and employees satisfaction surveys, philanthropic activities and community outreach efforts. These are all part of continuous efforts designed to manage risks, and do more and better business. And all of these activities can provide the information and context needed to produce a disciplined, balanced and more widely accepted GRI-type reporting that transcends the credibility discount applied to ‘PR brochures’.

Why are so many S&P 500 companies not leveraging their major investments to provide a better context, show off their commitments and highlight continuous improvement?

A look at ICMM, the International Council on Mining and Metals, showcases a very different situation. ICMM is a CEO led-association of 18 major mining and metals companies, along with 30 mining and commodity associations. ICMM’s company members (which include Business Roundtable member Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold) decided to leverage their investments by adopting GRI's sustainability reporting framework already in 2008.  It seems to me that ICMM members like BarrickGoldcorpNewmont and Vale decided to avoid a defensive approach and embraced transparency by adopting GRI, the most credible reporting framework at this time. ICMM even posts the GRI reporting status of its members for all to see here.

What does all of this mean for US businesses and their ‘clubs’.  The Business Roundtable’s ‘Enhancing Our Commitment to a Sustainable Future’ is an admirable statement. But it seems that very similar statements are being made by almost every industry and professional association across the US. It has turned into one of those motherhood and apple pie statements.

Are such statements credible and sufficient value for membership money? Or are due-paying members expecting more? Looking at sustainability related leadership efforts of industry associations, ICMM's actions strike me as most impressive and real value for its membership (and let me not forget: their stakeholders).

What’s next? Should the Business Roundtable and other leadership-driven business associations take their cue from ICMM? I would welcome your comments.

PS - And here tipping my hat to GRI reporting contingent in the BRT publication: ABB, Abbott, Accenture, Alcoa, American Electric Power, AT&T,  CB Richard Ellis Group, CH2MHill, Chevron, Coca-Cola, ConnocoPhillips, Cummins, Darden, Deloitte, Dow Chemical, Duke Energy, DuPont, Eastman Kodak, EMC, ExxonMobil, Freeport McMoran, Harrah’s Entertainment, HSBC, IBM, Ingersoll Rand, ITT, Johnson & Johnson, Johnson Controls, Life Technologies, McKesson, Merck & Co, Motorola, NextEra (formerly FPL), Office Depot, Owens Corning, PepsiCo, Praxair, Proctor & Gamble, Ryder, Sara Lee, SAS Institute, Siemens, Southern Company, Target, UAL, Weyerhaeuser, Whirlpool, Williams Companies, Xerox.

About the author: Mehrdad Nazari (MBA, MSc, LEAD Fellow) is a Corporate Responsibility, Sustainability Reporting & ESIA Advisor, and Director of Prizma. He was previously an environmental consultant with Dames & Moore, Principal Environmental Specialist at the EBRD and CSR Research Director at CoreRatings. Mehrdad is a GRI-approved trainer on GRI's sustainability reporting framework and a licensed AA1000 Assurance Provider.

Bookmark and Share

5 Responses to “A Little Secret – Sustainability Leadership at the Business Roundtable”

  1. January 22nd, 2011 at 3:21 pm

    Tweets that mention A Little Secret – Sustainability Leadership at the Business Roundtable | Prizma -- Topsy.com says:

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Susan McPherson, Mike Wallace. Mike Wallace said: Piece on #GRI reporting trends in business & industry assoc’s – #businessroundtable & #ICMM – where next? – http://bit.ly/ehSaKQ [...]

  2. January 23rd, 2011 at 9:45 am

    Kate says:

    While GRI standardised reporting is helpful:
    a) detailed legal requirement for CSR reporting (although preferably not requiring printed) is the only way to gain true level playing field and ‘raise the bar’,
    and, related
    b) good CSR reporting is unfortunately not neccesarily a strong indicator of a companys commitment to sustainability and human rights.
    There are many firms doing far more sustainable business who are not doing any CSR reports at all, and many with environmentally unsustainable business models with wonderful fancy GRI CSR reports.
    Some occasionally decide CSR reports can be expensive, and prefer to utilise those funds to deliver more impact in ‘the field’.

  3. March 22nd, 2011 at 4:01 pm

    15 of 18 ICMM Company Members Produced A+ GRI Reports | Prizma says:

    [...] First, 15 of ICMM’s 18 member companies obtained an ‘A+’ GRI Application Level for their sustainability reporting. This is impressive – and a consequence of ICMM’s formal adoption of GRI-based sustainability reporting to the highest disclosure level (A) combined with a commitment to external Third Party Assurance on behalf of its member companies (about which I blogged also here: A Little Secret – Sustainability Leadership at the Business Roundtable).  [...]

  4. April 20th, 2011 at 8:31 pm

    BRT’s 2011 Sustainability Report Dominated by GRI Reporters | Prizma says:

    [...] year’s numbers are roughly in line with my review of BRT's 2010 report (see also my blog: A Little Secret – Sustainability Leadership at the Business Roundtable). The spreadsheet highlighting GRI reporters contributing to BRT’s 2011 Report is attached here: [...]

  5. August 10th, 2011 at 5:54 pm

    Will GRI be able to catch IPIECA's lead? | Prizma says:

    [...] external Third Party Assurance on behalf of its member companies (about which I blogged also here: A Little Secret – Sustainability Leadership at the Business Roundtable). It seems that other important mining associations are also moving towards GRI as I blogged here: [...]

Leave a Reply

*